I shouldn't have been.
It's a classic Reformation principle .. for some.. that words are more important than images;
even that any images/imaginations of Jesus..therefore art..are forbidden as they are idolatry.
Note the picture (image!) on the cover consists of words about Jesus.
The well-meaning, but misguided premise, according to the author's blog:
Pictures "de-present" Christ—much more than they "re-present" him. The purpose of this book is to call Christians back to the Bible for their revelation of who Christ is.
The pictures everybody uses to represent Christ are not pictures of Christ at all. They are forbidden by Scripture. They are rooted in a non-biblical monistic idea of God—akin to pantheism. They become idolatrous, not just when they are "worshiped," but at the moment they are given the name of Christ. link
The whole book can be read on the right-hand bar of the author's blog.
An ironic quote:
"This book is necessary to bring Christians to their senses."— Richard Bennett
Hmm, primacy of senses and primacy of word..
The author comments:
"'The Passion of the Christ' movie by Mel Gibson...That is perhaps the deadliest influence of the movie is its subliminal denial of the Deity of Christ. Those who made the movie can insist that this man on the screen images Christ. Promoters of the movie may claim that the movie proclaims the Deity of Christ. But the movie makes us call Jim Caviezel “Christ”. This is idolatry. link
What would Mark DeRaud say?