Saturday, February 11, 2012

KYNO Boss 30 and Jesus: "Something In The Air"


I was transported in time gain today.
I didn't need the Toyota this time, all it took was a headline  today's Fresno Bee newspaper.



I have often said the first contemporary Christian song I ever heard was Keith Green's "Asleep in the Light" (Thanks to Rick Cottrell, who played it so loud that it bled right through the dorm walls of Module E By the Sea.).

The lyric haunted me, as it felt addressed to me (I didn't know at the time it was directed to the church, but in God's rhematic providence., it also spoke to me) : "Jesus rose from the dead/and YOU, you can't even get out of bed."  That killed me...and soon brought me to life...as I was just coming off five pre-Christian years where some days I couldn't get out of bed.

By the looks of this photo (particarly my hair)  taken in that era...there were days I shouldn't have!(:

But just a year or so after the photo, Keith Green's song began the process of my wake-up/shake -up call.

Gary Estes, my first roommmate, also blasted some Keith Green, probably hoping it would convert me.

It did, thank you.

But sometimes I remember that the first Christian song I ever heard was on KYNO Boss Radio, late 1960s/early 70s.  One of the "boss jocks" had become a Christian, and I assume it was he who arranged for (very early) Jesus music to be played early Sunday mornings on a syndicated show called "Power Line."


I remembering checking it out on my hip transistor radio.

I have no idea what the first song was.

I don't remember it impacting me.
But I'm sure it did.

It works  conventently and preveniently  like that.

Thank God for KYNO, and that Boss Jock, Ted Jordan.

You were all part of the process.



On to the column  in today's Fresno Bee that became my time machine; it was about KYNO's  boss of the "boss jocks."...

All it took was mention of "KYNO.."

So, she had me at the title.
But the opening line  could not help but take me aback...and take me back


It was 1969, the year of Woodstock, Chappaquiddick and Charles Manson. The year of "Everyday People," "Crimson and Clover" and "Honky Tonk Women,"

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/10/2717694_bonnie-hearn-hill-dave-belman.html#storylink=cpy

I could "name that tune" in one note. Those were my songs.

And then she floored me by  namechecking:

Boss Jocks Harry Miller, Big John Carter, Dirk Robinson, Bill Stevens, Sean Conrad

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/10/2717694_bonnie-hearn-hill-dave-belman.html#storylink=cpy

Those were my friends..friends I never met, but who narrated the narrative of my childhood.


It was amazing to grow up in the 60's; to hear the Beatles new singles(when they were new)....
siting in the backyard, maybe in this treehouse: CCR, Kinks, etc etc,.... And KYNO was cutting edge.  We all knew something special was happening in music, but there was no way of knowing just how historic the shift was.

" At KYNO, the world was younger and more alive with promise than it would ever be again,": the article articulately asserts.

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/10/2717694_bonnie-hearn-hill-dave-belman.html#storylink=cpy




Somehow in sovereignty, the sixties shaped who I am and prepped me for encounter with Keith Green...and Christ.  There was, in the language of a song of the day, "something in the air." (in fact, that exact song functioned as a Christian song for me, always the sucker for the ethereal song with the mystical lyrics, Keltic Ken will remember it..)



Here's what the writer, a KYNO employee back in the day, remembers about  her boss, Dave Bellman:


As I sat across from him with my lined yellow notebook on my lap, Belman explained how to write a commercial. "Triple-spaced, all in caps. Divide the page in half vertically. Make three copies." He shoved some carbon paper at me. "One for the jock, one for the folder, one for me."
"Where do you write the rough drafts?" I managed to ask.
He jabbed a nicotine-stained finger at the paper in his typewriter. "Right here."
"But what if ..." I could barely get the words out. "What if I make a mistake?"
Belman met my eyes, and for the first time, I caught the glimpse of a smile. "You do this."
He slammed his finger on the X key repeatedly, until the words were indecipherable.
If I'd learned only that from him -- about writing and about life -- it would have been enough. Over the next two years, I learned a great deal more.
           ...To those of us who had come from fractured childhoods -- and many of us did -- working with him was honest and safe. If he said he'd be there, he was. If we messed up, he'd hold us accountable. If we needed help, he'd give it. As one of our co-workers said, "He was our radio dad."

I'm not sure why KYNO continues to be the bond for many of us after all these years. Perhaps it's because we shared the crazy times and the music that reflected those times. Maybe it's because, at KYNO, the world was younger and more alive with promise than it would ever be again. I do know that Belman was part of that bond, a big part.
In a profession of gypsies, he was an anchor. In the permissive land of Boss Radio, he had rules.

When the conversations and the liquor flowed at Cedar Lanes, our hangout, he headed home to his wife and kids. We who were younger and wilder accepted his behavior just as we did his gruff-yet-caring demeanor. Although we had no word for it at the time, I know now that what we felt for Belman was respect.

In January, he died at age 92.

Right now, I'm thinking about his life and his influence on mine, both in those early days and now:

Write the first draft without fear.
Come back later and strike what doesn't work.
Don't be afraid of the delete key
.

Thank you, Dave Belman, for all you were and for all you taught me.
         -link, Dave Belman was 'boss' of Boss Radio



I had forgotten about "hitting the X key repeatedly, as now we have Control X.

But the principle has been a huge in my life, too.
Though I learned it from Anne Lammott ... do you know what she calls her first draft?

Thank God for  extreme do-overs and U-Turns.
I wouldn't be here without then..

But I wouldn't change a thing about my KYNO-soudtracked childhood.
(all my timelines trace back to it).

It helped lead me to Christ, back to Fresno, and to this post today.

..where those holy parchments that are the "KYNO Boss 30" playlists are collecting dust in the garage
in a box called "Dave's souvenirs."

KYNO is still around..though unrecognizable after multiple format changes.
In fact, in God's wild sense of humor and full circle, I was interviewed on KYNO last year.


About Jesus.
You can hear it here.
But I'd rather hear this 1970 playlist all over again.

It lead me to Christ.

Thank you, KYNO..
---------

See:



Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/10/2717694_bonnie-hearn-hill-dave-belman.html#storylink=cpy



Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/02/10/2717694_bonnie-hearn-hill-dave-belman.html#storylink=cpy

Timelines and Testations: Jesus, Sexonomics and Facebook

(found this online)
It has been hugely productive,
 revelatory, 
and (even) fun to, as part of a class that several others and I teach, have students plot out (on the whiteboard) their timeline.








As Pastor/Trucker Franks suggests below, sometimes it's "more about the journey than the destination."  (See also  "What if Torah/ מלכות השמים, is more 'journey  than 'doctrine'?")




We then take time to interweave/intertext our personal timelines with the timeline/trajectory of Jesus' life in Matthew's gospel (the thrust of the class).


Especially helpful is the suggestion by Donald Kraybill ("The Upside Down Kingdom") and Ray Van Der Laan (video)  that throughout  his earthly life, Jesus was revisited by remixes of the original three temptations ("testations" ) of the devil in chapter 4.


Kraybill provocatively proffers the following taxonomy of the temptations; suggesting that any later temptation Jesus faced (or we face) is at heart in one of these three spheres:



1=  Bread into stones: Economic 

2=Jump from temple and test God:Religious 

 3=Own all kingdoms: Political; 




Henri Nouwen ("in the Name of Jesus") breaks it down this way:


1=  Bread into stones:  temptation to be relevant

 2=Jump from temple and test God:   temptation to be spectacular  

3=Own all kingdoms: Political;   temptation to be rule over


So, it may be useful to plot out various temptations along your life timeline, and ask which of Jesus' temptation are each is  tied to.


Nouwen himself,  one of the most profound writers on the temptations of Jesus, was both Catholic (gasp!) and struggled with homosexual temptation (!!!)..


And....Uh, on that last temptation, the sexual one, he was in good company, according to a good Book I read:



"Jesus was tempted in every single way humans are..."(click here for the shocking source...but warning, it's a dangerous book for religious folk!) 


SO..if every temptation can be filed under one of the three categories:





Economic    Religious   Political..


or
Relevant    Spectacular   Rule over


..under which does sexual temptation occur?


Note Rob Bell's definition of "sexuality,"
                                            biblically defined:




"For many, sexuality is simply what happens between two people involving physical pleasure. But that's only a small percentage of what sexuality is. Our sexuality is all the ways we strive to reconnect with our world, with each other, and with God." (Rob Bell, "Sex God," p. 42)...




How might virtually all temptations (the three Jesus faced, or others you could name) be fundamentally economic?  Kraybill, you'll remember, calls the bread temptation "economic," but how might any/all others temptations trace to this root/'garbage"?
HINT: Note that he term economics comes from the Ancient Greekοἰκονομία (oikonomia, "management of a household, administration") from οἶκος (oikos, "house") + νόμος (nomos, "custom" or "law"), hence "rules of the house(hold)".[1]  

------------------


Note  that the baptism of Jesus  (chapter 3) and the temptations (chapter 4) should be read together as one literary unit or paragraph ( a "coupling" or "particularization") as two items connected.


Remember how important repeated words are..in this case,  "SON":














-The segue is direct..."Then after his baptism, Jesus was led by the Spirit  into the desert for temptation by the devil."  (Matt. 4:1)
(see this amazing assortment of Scriptures, maybe he is "God's devil" after all..)




-In light of that, ask In what other ways do the baptism and temptation connect?
How does baptism prepare for temptation?


See the sermon by Nadia Bolz-Weber, "How To Say Defiantly, ‘I am Baptized!’"for a contemporary world application.






NOTE: a drop-down box in the temptation  scene:





The devil's text ,


"IF 
you are the son of God.."


might better be translated
(according to the Greek word used) as:


"SINCE   
you are the son of God.."


What difference might it make?  Is the devil wondering/questioning asking Jesus if he is son of God?  Or is he assuming it; he and Jesus both know that he is...and thus "Since you are the Son of God, what kind of ways can I tempt you to use/abuse that Sonship?"
--
Van Der Laann, in "Jesus Our Desert – The Three Temptations") proposes that the three "temptations" Jesus met in Matthew 4 were the same three  that show up  (repackaged, revisited) throughout Jesus' timeline on earth...right up to, and especially including the cross (as in, not avoiding it) .Several examples:


 
  • Jesus put God ahead of family ("Who are my brothers and sisters?"  "Whoveer loves father and mother more than me cannot be my disciple."-Matthew 12:46-48...in fact, how many ways can you find in that whole chapter  where Jesus re-encounters versions of one of the testations?
  • When people reported Herod wanted to kill him, he was not concerned (Luke 13)
  • When people wanted to make him king by force, he walked away  (John 6:15)
  • When the crowds were hungry, the disciples  wanted Jesus to feed them.  He refused (Feeding of the Multitude)
  • The "get behind me, Satan" comment to Peter when Peter suggested Jesus should bypass the cross (Matthew 18)
  • "go ahead and use Your power; the cross is going to hurt" 

The video offered lots of help on how the Testations of Jesus are related to/equated to/hyperlinked to the Testations of Israel in Exodus, Numbers. Deuteronomy.  It is no accident that all three testations of Jesus were found in different form in the OT, as well as the Scriptures Jesus used to counter the testations.

Though it is obvious who "The Son (of God)" is in Matthew (Jesus), unless we know the literary/historical background, we miss that in the Old Testament, that phrase is used for Israel/God's people.   (see  Exodus 4:22-23 and especially the way Matt 2:15 quotes Hosea 11:1) Thus...remember this chart :





Now we realize that God tested/the devil tempted the first "SON" in a similar way.
Jesus the Son succeeds (in 40 days) in "reversing the curse" that Israel the Son inherited by not passing it (in 40 years).


Jesus is not only (in a sense) the
New Moses,
 but (in a sense) the New Israel
 (for help on that important point, see this  article,
and this).
 




VanDer Laan suggested that the heart of Jesus' "success" was consistently  and persistently keeping the "Shema,"   and not caving into a (mis)use of power.  This is the "binder" of the testations: Love God and neighbor.Thus


Q).Who is Jesus in Matthew?
A.) The One who, unlike Israel, passed the wilderness testations by loving God with all his heart, soul, mind and strength....and refusing to give into using "right-handed"  (a la Capon) power.

 VanderLaan prefers to translate "tests" instead of "temptations."
You have seen that I have coined the word "testations"  It would seen that in Scripture that God tests, and the devil tempts...and sometimes both are going on simultaneously. 


HERE are some helpful questions you might think about if you want to pursue this topic::


  • 1)What were the three temptations of Jesus in Matthew 4:1-11, Compare any ways Mark's account,  Mark 1:12-13  and  Luke's account, Luke 4:1-13 differ, and suggest any reasons why.
  • 2)How does Nouewen summarize the three temptations(1=to be relevant  2=to be spectacular 3=to rule over). H?  How do you (use your own words)?
  • 3)How do the three temptations connect to the historical and literary world of the Hebrew ("Old')Testament?
  • 4)How do the three temptations connect to the contemporary world of Jesus and the disciples?
  • 5)List and discuss several possible ways that versions of the three temptations reoccur and are revisited  throughout Jesus' life in Matthew's gospel?  (How is Jesus tested/tempted elswhere in Matthew, and how are the temptations versions of a similar one (two, or three) that he faced in the original temptation passage?
  • 6)What are the three core temptations you face, and how have they revisited you  throughout your timeline?  How would you categorize them using Nouwen's categories?  Using the three categories of the "Shema"  (heart/mind/might) a la  Vander Laan'?  Using Kraybill's three categories (1=Economic 2=Religious  3=Political; see chapters 1-4 of "Upside Down Kingdom")
  • 7)What have you learned about passing these tests/resiisting these temptations?
  • 8)What does all of this  (the Matt 4 Scripture, and testing/tempting) have to do with the Kingdom?
  • 9)Discuss how the passages that deal with Jesus not being immune to temptation( Hebrews 2:17-18, Hebrews 4:14-16,  and Hebrews 5:7-9) affect your views of  "Who is Jesus?" and of Jesus' divinity and humanity.
  •  
-----------
 Finally..


Facebook!


I started teaching all this before Facebook announced it was changing its entire format/interface to "Timeline." As you probably know by now ( If note read all about it here), your Facebook   page and wall (oops, the wall is renamed "timeline") is now regeared to feature and celebrate key points (and photos) of your life.
Ostensibly, the (eventually mandatory) switch was about the fun of highlighting historical markers of your life.  As we all (should) know, it's all about Facebook catching even more personal data about us, so they can better target their ads towards us..


...in an attempt to tempt us.


So, whatever their motive, I also see the switch as a significant (sign-ificant) sign of the times;
there is a hunger in the culture for narrative/story/journey.  Such is integral to the postmodern shift of our EPIC times.


So, plot your life and testations...if not on Facebook, on paper or in your mind.


Who knows what you'll learn.


Maybe how to me more like Jesus...who faced equivalent temptations to all of us..and passed the test.


..But you know, he never was on Facebook ..


--
In any case, the clincher for the argument that the devil's ideas {in the wilderness temptations}aren't all bad comes from Jesus himself. At other times, in other places, and for his own reasons, Jesus does all of the things the devil suggests. Instead of making lunch out of rocks, he feeds the five thousand miraculously--basically the same trick, on a grander scale. Instead of jumping off the temple and not dying, he dies and refuses to stay dead--by any standards, an even better trick. And finally, instead of getting himself bogged down in a two-man presidency with an opposite number he doesn't really understand, he aces out the devil on the cross and ends up risen, ascended at the right hand of the Father as King of Kings and Lord of Lords--which is the best trick of all, taken with the last trump.
No, the difference between Jesus and the devil does not lie in what the devil suggested, but in the methods he proposed--or more precisely, in the philosophy of power on which his methods were based...If you are really God, the devil says, do something. Jesus answers, I am really God, therefore I do nothing...The devil wants power to be used to do good; Jesus insists that power corrupts and defeats the very good it tries to achieve.
..the devil in the wilderness overs Jesus a short cut, Jesus calls it a dead end and turns a deaf ear.-Robert Farrar Capon "The Third Peacock," 43-45.


"Contracted":

understudied and reckless fool
spliced heart laments
staccato bravado
Eucharisting torments

still small in grief
Mourning has broken my record of wrongs
tidal wave offering
strange land , banned songs

immersed by the mystic,
simplexity of trust
Sinai volcano
Seeking one justice; not one is just

testation of forty
daze of wilderness retreats
It is written largely
Adonai slyly defeats

power overpowered,
i found faith
 in time.

Monday, February 06, 2012

That's Wright, you stud: Jesus is New Moses, Neo Victor, and reshaper of space, time and matter

=

I simply haven't even started "Simply Jesus" yet. (I know, simply no excuse).


Three emphases stand out for me  already from Scot McKnight's series of posts  and I will post a review after reading it on the plane today (pray for a quiet trip, such don't always happen).

1) The evocation and invocation of seven Exodus themes as central to Jesus'  message ministry as New Moses::


  • tyrant
  • leader
  • divine victory
  • sacrifice
  • vocation
  • divine presence
  • promised inheritance.
image source
BTW, is this (simply) a sequential narrative with seven "stops," or can it  (also) be

a seven-Venned  (see this schema) which can be hermeneutically entered anywhere?










See Scot McKnight:

The major themes of the Exodus are at the heart of Tom Wright’s new book Simply Jesus: A New Vision of Who He Was, What He Did, and Why He Matters. But there’s more to say than that: Exodus is at the heart of the entire mission of Jesus. Because this Exodus theme is both cut up into its seven segments (more below) and because Exodus becomes more central, it is fair to say that Simply Jesus takes us beyond Tom’s well-known Jesus and the Victory of God. He puts it all together in this book….

First the seven Exodus themes are tyrant, leader, divine victory, sacrifice, vocation, divine presence, and promised inheritance. This is at the heart of this book.

Second, Tom sketches how three absolutely crucial (to Jesus and to the apostles) figures of the Old Testament illustrate these seven themes and therefore are instances of carrying forward the Exodus project. The three figures are the Servant of Isaiah 40-66, the Son of Man of Daniel 7, and Zechariah’s king, esp as found in the last half of Zechariah. You will have to take my word for it that he has given us an important sketch of exodus themes here.

Third, now the big one: Jesus’ mission is shaped by those same themes, and so I want to quote from what I think is perhaps the crucial paragraph in this whole book. Remember: it’s Exodus, Exodus from Moses through Isaiah, through Daniel, through Zechariah, and now reshaped and reconfigured for a new day in a new way by Jesus — the three-fold storm converging: Rome, Jewish leaders, and the new message about God becoming king in and through Jesus -link:Simply Jesus 4
Neo Jesus 2)Related, Richard Beck picks up on the Christus Victor (which I can never envision without thinking of Neo/Keanu)  connection:

A lot of people are listing N.T. Wright's recent book Simply Jesus on their "Best Books" lists for 2011. I agree, it's a great book and a lot of the book nicely supplements the work we've been doing in this series, particularly the work with Christus Victor theology. Recall, in the last few posts we've been thinking about the role of "the satanic" in human relations through the work of Walter Wink and William Stringfellow (and earlier in this series the Church Fathers and Eastern Orthodox theology).

What is the book Simply Jesus about? Simply stated (he he!), the book is trying to get into the head of Jesus. What did Jesus think he was doing during his life and ministry? How did he see himself? How did he envision his task? That's the question the book starts off with. The very opening lines:
Jesus of Nazareth poses a question and a challenge two thousand years after his lifetime. The question is fairly simple: who exactly was he? This includes the questions, What did he think he was up to?...
You'll have to read the book to find out all the in's and out's of the answers to that question. What I'd like to do is underline the Christus Victor themes from the book that supplement and reinforce what we've been talking about in this series. Specifically, Wright argues, rightly in my opinion, that Jesus primarily saw himself as doing battle with the devil.
1 John 3.8b
The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.
This conflict was framed by the Second Exodus expectations that Jesus invoked as he described his life and ministry. As Wright describes it, the Exodus story had seven themes:

  1. Wicked tyrant
  2. Chosen leader
  3. Victory of God
  4. Rescue by sacrifice
  5. New vocation and way of life
  6. Presence of God
  7. Promised/inherited land
By invoking this story, in announcing the inauguration of a Second Exodus, Jesus uses the seven themes (the Exodus narrative/paradigm) to describe his own life, teachings, and eventual death and resurrection.

So the question becomes who is the "Wicked tyrant"? Who is playing the part of Pharaoh in Jesus's dramatic retelling of the Exodus?

For a lot of the Jews Rome and Caesar would have been the obvious contender. But as we know, Jesus didn't say much of anything about Roman occupation and oppression.

So who is Pharaoh?

Well, this is where the Christus Victor themes come in. Here is Wright, after many chapters working through New Exodus material, finally turning to the battle with the Wicked tyrant....
         -Continued at "The Slavery of Death: Part 18, N.T. Wright on Christus Victor"

--
3)Again, related to the point above, and riffing off it:

  The "temple tantrum" passage is huge for me --particularly, what it was  fundamentally and microcosmically about;  and also its relationship to anger, battle and violence.  (I am inclined the believe the passage is the centerpoint of a "ripping" inclusio in Mark).  So I was thrilled to read this, from McKnight's series on the book, and find yet another of my favorite themes which is OBVIOUSLY(: and always  connected to the temple tantrum: the physics of time
 (Wright had been simply eading my mail.  I'll be retrurning the favor by simply reading his book )

It is Tom Wright’s contention, in his new book Simply Jesus: A New Vision of Who He Was, What He Did, and Why He Matters, that Jewish kingdom movements had two integral features: a battle and the temple. Tom examines those two themes in the Gospel records about Jesus.

First, the battle: “it was a different sort of thing, because it had a different sort of enemy,” and here Tom examines “the satan” in the Bible. There is so much battle with “the satan” in the records about Jesus that it has to be taken not only as an element but significant (Mark 1:13, 27, 34; 3:11-12, 22-27; 5:1-20; Luke 10:18; 13:16; 22:31; John 13:2, 27).  To be sure, we may struggle with this stuff but that doesn’t mean they (or Jesus) did. That battle seems to have two stages: an earlier stage (the Temptation) and a final victory. The satan’s victory is the cross, but the victory was not to last.

How central are the battle and the temple to most of our understandings of Jesus? How central are space, time and matter? Do you think these ideas are supersessionistic or continuous with Judaism?

Second, the temple. Here Tom focuses on the “cleansing of the temple,” which is really a royal declaration of God’s judgment on the temple and its authorities.


This leads Tom into one of the more creative portions of this book: Jesus reshapes space, time and matter. Tom’s big idea is that God is becoming king in and through Jesus as his earthly representative. The temple was the place where heaven and earth met, where God’s presence overlapped. But Jesus redefined space by contending God’s presence was wherever Jesus was. “Jesus was, as it were, a walking Temple” (133). That Temple was a signpost but now that God was present in Jesus, the Temple was coming to an end. It became redundant, it was criticized as a place of economic oppressions, and it was a place of violent ambition.

As for time. Sabbath was the place where God’s time and our time met with God’s temporal presence, and Jesus saw himself as superior to the Sabbath. He is the walking, celebrating, and victorious Sabbath.

And as for matter. Big one here: new creation renews matter. The key element of this is Jesus’ miracles. The material world is being transformed. Matter becomes a more visible glorious presence of God. Another important indicator of this theme: the transfiguration of Jesus in Matthew 17:1-8. -Link:Simply Jesus 3

N.T. Wright is simply a Bible Stud...unlike some wannabees (see pic)...and he simply would never stand in front of the 'Y"...