Monday, September 03, 2007

the blue elephant in the pew

Wally The Weiner (the inflatable Christian penis) has been a great mascot of xxx.church.com. But just in time for this year's National Porn Sunday (part and parcel of the liturgical calendar for all happenin churches),



they have unveiled...actually blown up:

The blue elephant in the pew.

Here he is:




Any critics? The wisdom attributed to DL Moody applies.

Sunday, September 02, 2007

A Serial Killer is After You

It is hilarious. But promise me you''ll use it with caution.


I learned about it from the Wired Magazine article, excerpted below:

It looks like one of those video-sharing sites that's not GooTube. It even ends in ".tv", the way the cool sites do now. An embedded video window beckons you to click Play.

When you do, you'll see a news clip from Miami television station WBFX telling you that a serial killer is on the loose. As people in hazmat suits clean up a bloody crime scene, a youthful reporter describes the demographics of the victims, and they're all remarkably like you -- same gender, age, even occupation.

Dexter And then your intestines freeze: on the wall of the crime scene, written in blood, is your name, with the warning that you are next. The reporter says the cops are hoping to find that person before the serial killer does. The video ends, and the only part of your brain that still functions is the part trying to decide whether you should call 911 and have the police take you into protective custody, or if you should just drive to the police station yourself.

But then comes the real punchline: you've been hoaxed. The website and video are part of a viral promotion for Dexter, a show on FXUK about, wouldn't you just guess, a serial killer. Someone you know -- probably one of your closest friends -- entered your name, demographics, and email into the website, which then generated the video and sent you a link. And now that you're in on the gag, you're offered the opportunity to scare it forward by providing someone else's info. Even though, in a world in which a major city can be paralyzed with fear by a few strategically placed Lite-Brites, a website that cranks out serial killer threats is wrong in too many ways to count.

Of course, I sent one to everyone I know. (read the rest here)



I have to show you the video I rigged this morning for John Milor from our church . You are supposed to be able to embed the movie player on your blog, but that feature isn't working right now, so you can watch it on the original website here.

OK, here's the page (www.icetruck.tv)to sign up your friends....As you have noticed, one of the coolest feature is personalizing a handwritten note the hiller wrote.
Have fun, but remember, as the article concludes
:

So far the responses I've gotten have been muted: real death threats, charges of assault, social ostracism (my brother's email read simply: "You are no longer my brother."). Even when they later claim to notice the anomalies in the video -- a Miami tv station would never call a parking lot a "car park", the "handwritten" message is written in Helvetica type, the security camera footage is all wrong -- seeing their name in blood was terrifying to every one of my victims. They calmed their fears by promptly sending a video to everyone they know.

The next step: some moron will send one of these to an elected official, and wind up on the receiving end of some Secret Service lovin'.



"Jesus went to the bathroom" & other good articles

all from the "shift happens" forum...see you there:





No new posts Ted Haggard, Meth w/Gay Prostitutes...all in 2D




No new posts Detoxing from Church




No new posts Why I Go To Burning Man










No new posts Keltic Ken, St. Arbuck's and a Funky 3-Stranded Cord




No new posts Regensburg, Islam, and the Church's response




No new posts Monty Python asks Where are the Muslim Satirists?




No new posts The Trinity is Right-Brained &Smokes Cigars




No new posts Freedom is just chaos, with better lighting




No new posts Elvis's Greatest Legacy?




No new posts God with a Fez cap?..help!




No new posts Agitators & Radio Orthodoxy:Campolo & McCLaren




No new posts Virgin Sacrifices: in the bulletin?




No new posts seduction of apostles: keep quiet




No new posts musica de la iglesia




No new posts Jesus I love you, but I don't understand your wife




No new posts 'I don't know if this is right, but I know it works'




No new posts Pioneer God Scares the Hell Out of Settlers




No new posts Jesus bound and gagged...just like we like Him




No new posts Bush Explains His Theological Perspective on Iraq




No new posts Anchor For the Soul in Times of Deep Shift




No new posts Praying with Chester at House of Blues: Stalked by God




No new posts Repeating Sex and Prayer is Ok




No new posts Paui Made Tents




No new posts ways of doing church that no one has thought of yet




No new posts Prophets or Pirates?




No new posts Dear Abby Addresses Dressing Up For Church




No new posts Celtic links up the wazoo




No new posts Bars should become churches, not vice versa




No new posts Does your pastor jog naked?




No new posts Does John Mac Arthur Worship the Bible?




No new posts one afternoon at jack in the box




No new posts "a miracle in search of a disaster": missional fat




No new posts "Jesus did NOT go to the bathroom!"




No new posts Keltic Kristianity




No new posts Take The Challenge: Watch 24 Hours of TBN




No new posts Anatomically Correct Statue of Jesus




No new posts 'tied with beer and sex and losing only to the iPod'!
3


View latest post
No new posts Jesus does not want us to change the world

Saturday, September 01, 2007

Storytelling without moralizing...or morality

"I was resolute in my determination to avoid even a whiff of moralizing in terms of applying the stories. The absolute last thing I ever wanted to ask a child was: “And what can we learn from David about how God wants us to behave?” The story isn’t there to be an example for us to follow. If that were the point, Jesus would never needed to have come. We could have saved ourselves.

The story is there because it’s true and because it’s telling the bigger story—of the greater David who is coming. To do for us what we couldn’t do for ourselves, to fight the battle we could never fight. To be the Hero we all need. To be our Rescuer.

I wanted children to know this Story—and to meet this wonderful Hero in the pages of this book. Because rules don’t change you. But a story can."

-Bob Hyatt, link



"(In storytelling), the only morality is to not be dishonest"
-Stanley Kubrick (quoted in David Dark's amazing "Everyday Apocalypse : The Sacred Revealed in Radiohead, the Simpsons, and Other Pop Culture Icons"

The Day I Prayed for Ray Bradbury


Ray Bradbury
smiled at me, and "amen-ed" my prayer.

As one who grew up reading and relishing Bradbury's books about space travel ("The Martian Chronicles" etc), I had to smile back at him and bask in the moment.

The junior high boy I was would've loved the be the man I was now:

all grown up; now a pastor; and one who had been asked to give the invocation at a "Friends of the Library" program in Delano, California that Bradbury was to speak at.

How could I say no?

Someone had obviously talked Bradbury into making the long trip by car...in the passenger seat.. from his Southern California home. This I know because:

Ray Bradbury,writer of all kinds of glorious books about the glories of space travel, does not drive.

!
Turns out that years ago, he had witnessed a terrible car accident that spooked him out of ever driving again.

Or flying, if I am not mistaken.

The author of "R is For Rocket" won't even get in a plane.

Now that "will preach," as they say.It makes a number of points about life, faith, tragedy and risk...irony preaches.

But I don't want to belittle Bradbury,or call him a wimp. Had I seen what he did, I might have made the same choice.

He gave a delightful talk on (here's a video of a library talk he gave a decade later that looks like it should've started with a prayer!) the place of imagination in life and faith.

Bradbury does not lack imagination.

And if we can travel there,maybe half the battle has been won.

As the great theologians SpongeBob and Patrick demonstrate superbly and prophetically here.

I fear the church...that includes me...is afraid of imagination, more than any literal travel it might be called to.

" Left to their own imagination,people will devise all sorts of crazy stuff about God, " Bono once preached. Elsewhere he prescribes: "for all this: imagination!..To tell our stories, to paint pictures…but above all to glimpse another way of being. Because as much as we need to describe the world we live in, we need to dream up the kind of world we want to live in."

And if like C.S. Lewis, we shudder to think of a church without imagination; how about this reminder from Bradbury that we may not live in fantasy enough!!:
“ First of all, I don't write science fiction. I've only done one science fiction book and that's Fahrenheit 451, based on reality. Science fiction is a depiction of the real. Fantasy is a depiction of the unreal. So Martian Chronicles is not science fiction, it's fantasy. It couldn't happen, you see? That's the reason it's going to be around a long time—because it's a Greek myth, and myths have staying power.[4]
]
So Ray Bradbury, who was partly responsible for me wanting to be an astronaut when I was young, got in the passenger seat of the car, and went home.


He probably did something bold and blatantly Christian : imagined and fantasized all the way home.

A freer man than me.

I probably walked across the street to my nice safe pastor's office.

Hypocrite.

Wimp.

In the "invocation" an hour before, I had surely thanked God for the wonderful gift of literature, fantasy, and imagination.

I should have gotten in the car with one of my favorite and fearless theologians.

video of Ed Stetzer feeling young & thin..but about to get shot

I cannot believe they didn't shoot him.

Maybe they did; the video clip stops suddenly after he calls his audience old and fat.

Or something like that.

One has to love Ed Stetzer...as a Southern Baptist mission researcher, telling his fellow Southern Baptists where to get off...or on. Or at least calling them...in love...old and fat.

Or something exactly like that.

Here is the clip below (with thanks to Blind Beggar, who comments "I hope they heard him."...I'm not sure they did:a prominent SBC seminary just announced this...amazing!!).
The last twenty five seconds or so are what I am taking about. I'd give anything to see a pan of the audience for the next twenty five seconds.




No wonder Earl Creps includes Stetzer as #5 in his list of 13 Things I Like About the Southern Baptist Convention.

Enjoy:

The Meaning of History at St. Arbuck's..in 3 Easy Strands


Maybe the beloved biblical maxim about a strand of three cords not being easily broken is not just for marriages anymore.

And maybe it will work in my favor here.

All (!) I want to do in the next few (!) minutes is string together three strands; and note how they interrelate/intercalate, dovetail/Dovetail and form/inform each other:


  • 1.) The emerging consensus of missiology preceding ecclesiology
  • 2.) Quantum loops and the emergence of spacetime and gravity
  • 3.) The epistemological emergence of consciousness/soul

All right, for the three of you still reading(:.........

At least the common word "emergence" has tied all three together. But isn't it obvious (or is
Tim correct in his analysis of me: "you always push toward the unobvious") that all three phenomena are versions of (strand-ed together by) the same meta-phenomenon (that being: the meaning of history)?

Okay, for the two of you still reading...

This morning at St. Arbuck's I asked the ever prophetic subversive punster Keltic Ken (from Klovis) the question that everyone at every table of every St. Arbuck's is asking, if they really admit it:

"What is the meaning of history?"

He said (correct me, Ken) something like "God working out his purposes, and revealing himself, through sinful humanity."

I immediately congratulated him on his intuitive transcendence of a hyper-Hegelian overemphasis on "God/Geist AS history."

But if history/culture is indeed the chief "secular" venue in which is God is attempting to sovereignly self-disclose, Ken is (as usual) onto something huge.

And since we are blessed to live "at such a (postmodern/emerging/shift) time as this" IN history (David Dark: "this weird moment in history)":

"God must have a lot of confidence in you to put you on the planet at just this time. It was his sovereign decision to insert you onto planet earth during a time of huge transition. It takes incredible faith to lead during hinge points of history. " -Reggie McNeal,"The Present Future"

And to offer a surprising..but accurate...twist on the usual semantic domain of faith/confidence, try this quote from Graham Cooke:

"When the old wineskin is dying, the new wineskin is created by people who are not afraid to be vulnerable. "

Or this from ecologist Buhro:

"When the forms of an old culture are dying, the new culture is created by a few people who are not afraid to be insecure"



Thus...we need...counterintuitively...some profound and holy insecurity/vulnerability to our faith-life in these amazing days to see all that could come to pass, actually materialize. Because Bono is right: "History is more malleable than you think."

If Ken is right about the meaning of history is , and Bono is correct about
the mallebility of history..

...then maybe we shouldn't be afraid to (assuming Cooke and Buhro are spot-on) tie my three strands together, and see what emerges and converges.

The three strands, then, laid out:

-----------------------------------------------

1)Missiology precedes eccelesiology

Len asked a million dollar question ,"Do you think missiology precedes ecclesiology, or it is the other way round?" and then collected answers by some seminal thinkers and bloggers. These answers are all worth weighing, and are posted here:




Brother Maynard teases that this question is an "evil little trick"...as it may well be a"both/and" paradox (Alan Hirsch: "Dualistic expressions of faith always result in practical polytheism" or Heidegger : “It makes a difference where one enters the circle”);

it may well be a "the two are essentially the same" (a la the classic quote by Emil Bruner, "The Church exists by mission, as fire exists by burning");

but ultimately...against everything we've been taught in Sunday School and seminary (Brian Dodd: "Healthy churches tend to have non seminary trained leaders...')... it may best be a "yes, missiology precedes."

As I have said (I doubt it's original with me), "The church doesn't have a mission, the mission has a church."

Or as Len has..better..said: "It is not the Church of God that has a mission in the world — it is the God of mission who has a Church in the world."


By the way, since you asked(:... my longwinded answer to Len's question is here (and there Steve Porter lovingly challenges me, which makes me think(: I may even be right)..and if you want the short wind of my article, concludes:


So, again, If I had to pick an answer, it would be yes..missiology tends to precede and produce ecclesiology; philosophically, epistemologically, and practically speaking. I find quantum physics hugely helpful here; especially 'reverse causality," which accords with what Ladd has well emphasized about the Kingdom entering this age "from" the future; time working 'backwards," etc. This will be fleshed out (incarcarnated) in smaller, organic, networked and non-hierarchical (all lessons from physics again; the universe is such) ways and means...

...Meaning that counterintuitively to our modern mindset, doing can precede being; missiology can even (creatively) create ecclesiology.


I asked a friend today the question at hand. She immediately answered, "Missiology, of course. God told Moses he was being sent; before God even told Moses what his (God's) name was."


Holy smoke, she's right!

Bono nails it again (in a sermon he has preached around the world); "God may be with us in our mansions on the hill...I hope so....but God is with the poor. And God is with us, if we are with the poor."

We find our ecclesiology as we find and follow our missiological tug.


In the process, we might even find God.


Or as Hirsch would have it:
Christology>Missiology>Ecclesiology

(And check out Cultural Savage's addendum)

And as Mike Todd would unpack that:

Our Christology leads to missiology which leads to ecclesiology..In other words, who Jesus is gives us our mission, and our mission prescribes what church should be. How many of us in the west have that exactly backwards? We need to reboot, as Al calls it. We need to return to our primary source documents--the Gospels--and figure out who this Jesus was. Or, as we put it in our faith community:
We need to get to know Jesus again for the first time -link


Note: Andrew Jones and Radical Congruency have also asked the question(answering it similarly) and assembled answers..


2.) Quantum loops and the emergence of spacetime and gravity
..
Some of the debate in quantum physics revolves around whether the curvature of spacetime creates gravity, or the other way around. Like the question in #1, this could well be construed as a both/and... chicken-egg ...Or, just as missiology can assume precedence, there may be something a priori (in a spacetime way)about space-time...as in the common consensus:"gravity arises out of the curvature of spacetime".






3.) The epistemological emergence of consciousness/soul
I love the Hofsadter title "I am Strange Loop'. Because I am, amen? Check out his cheeky interview about the book here, and consider his thesis that Consciousness/"soul" arises out of a series of self-refrerential loops" By the way, literally a Pulitzer-Prize winning thesis.


And then weigh in with a quote Roger Penrose (no slouch either...co-winner with Stephen Hawking of the Wolf Prize for Physics" that floored me, (or to switch the metaphor back, stranded my #2 and #3 cords together):



"I have argued strongly against the view (of computational functionalism) in which it is merely computational activity that gives rise to conscious mentality), and I have indeed suggested that consciousness actually depends on (emerges from) the missing gravitational OR theory." -The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe , p. 1033)


Threw me for a loop (pun intended...as it is technically "loop quantum gravity" that is under discussion)..

Consciousness emerges from a self-referential loop; eh, Hofsatdter?...And (maybe this is the same thing) perchance it (also?) emerges from spacetime-based gravity.

All that to say God knew what he was doing when he embedded himself in history/culture/physics.

---------------
There you go; I have only begun exporing this three-standed triad. And I am aware that it is in the liminal spaces/thin places/holy Venning where they overlap that a lot is to be learned.



If we are about our Godbusiness of being missional then God will back us up (I love one of E Stanley Jones's keynotes: When you think Kingdomly and missionally, "You are no longer working against the grain of the universe; you are working with it.") to the tune of space and time "suddenly" and sovereignly working in our favor, and...as a free bonus, our loopy souls and consciousness will get bigger.

Ain't that the veritable meaning of history?

I am serious.
And if you seriously want to hear more about time and space working for us as Kingdom partners, check this out.

Because THAT is the meaning of history! I learned it at St. Arbuck's! (And maybe from a good book called..uh, "The Meaning of History".)

Would the one of you still reading (likely Ken or Len)...pick up here?....

after I give Reggie McNeal the last word so far:

The current spiritual awakening in North America lacks Christian content and file systems. This is the scary part of it. Left to their own imagination people will devise all sorts of crazy stuff about God, from New Age crystals to self-enlightenment. But this is also the opportunity of the current spiritual landscape. People are open to revealed truth of God if they can get it. Unfortunately, the North American church has lost its influence at this critical juncture. It has lost its influence because it has lost its identity. It has lost its identity because it has lost is mission.

The correct response, then, to the collapse of the church culture is not to try to become better at doing church. The need is not for a methodological fix. The need is for a missional fix.

The appropriate response to the emerging world is a rebooting of the mission, a radical obedience to an ancient command, a loss of self rather than self preoccupation, concern about service and sacrifice rather than concern about style.

The collapse of the church culture is God's gracious invitation to the church to rediscover itself. It will do this by dying to itself and coming alive to God's mission.link